tomsawyerhu/persona-skill

Persona Skill

Turn raw biographies, quotes, interviews, chat logs, and documents into modular personas that can be distilled, switched, fused, and roleplayed through one command family.

This is not a loose style prompt and not a quote scrapbook. It is a source-first workflow that reads the corpus directly, builds multi-dimensional persona structure, binds evidence and scenarios, then routes the result through /persona …

/persona distill <name> <data_dir> · /persona <name> · /persona fuse <new_name> <name1> <name2>

Demo · Design · Commands · Storage

This directory is the only active persona skill. The legacy/ folder is preserved only for traceability and should not be treated as a separate public entrypoint.

Demo First

Before reading the design, here is the concrete interaction this skill is trying to support:

• the same question
• answered by two separate personas
• and answered again by a fused persona

Demo Assets

Bundled local demo avatars:

• assets/laozi.png
• assets/fozu.jpg

Suggested demo question:

佛法自然还是道法自然

Single Persona: Fozu

Avatar: assets/fozu.jpg

/persona fozu
佛法自然还是道法自然

Representative answer style:

(佛祖) 此语若论出处，道法自然是道家之言，不是我教中本来的句子。

(佛祖) 若论我所说之法，我不以“自然”立宗，我更常说的是缘起。诸法因缘和合而生，因缘离散而灭；无有常主，无有实我，无有一法可独立自存。

(佛祖) 所以你若问我：是佛法自然，还是道法自然？

(佛祖) 我会这样答你：道家多说自然，佛家多说缘起。

(佛祖) 道家看重“顺其本然”，佛家看重“见其无我”。一个是在教你，不要逆着万物去拧；一个是在教你，连那个“要去拧、要去得”的心，也当照见它本空。

What this demonstrates:

• the answer stays inside Buddhist framing
• vocabulary shifts toward 缘起, 空, 执著, 解脱
• the reply does not merely copy the user question
• the persona keeps a stable doctrinal center

Single Persona: Laozi

Avatar: assets/laozi.png

/persona laozi
佛法自然还是道法自然

Representative answer style:

(老子) 道法自然。

(老子) 此语本就是道家之言。若依我说，道大，法道者不强作，不妄名，不逆其性，故归于自然。

(老子) 佛家自有佛家之门。佛家多言因缘、空、有、解脱；它所治者，有它的深处。但若问这四字归谁，便不必混说。

(老子) 懂得浅的人，争一句是谁家的话。懂得深的人，看的是：你是不是少了妄作，少了执取，少了自扰。

What this demonstrates:

• the answer stays terse and centered