注意:Anthropicの月20ドルのサブスクリプションでClaudeコードが利用可能なので、検討しています CodeMCPは完全に時代遅れです。しかし、良い設計アイデア(特に)はあります 最終的には現行世代に移植したいGitバージョン管理方式です 主体的コーディングCLISの。

codemcp

codemcpをインストールしてClaude Desktopをペアプログラミングアシスタントにしてください。with Claudeに直接機能の実装やバグ修正を依頼できます コンピュータ上のコードベース上でリファクタリングを行います。Claudeはファイルを直接編集し、 テストを実行しろ。クロードのチャットウィンドウにコードをコピーしたりコピーしたりするのはさよならだ!

CodeMCPは他のAIコーディングソフトウェア(Claude Code、 カーソル、クライン、エイダー)は、デザイン空間において独特な位置を占めています。

1. これはAnthropicの月20ドルのClaude Proと一緒に使うことを想定しています サブスクリプションプラン。サブスクリプションプランで利用料を支払うのが好きです なぜなら、それはエージェントの行動に対して限界費用ゼロを意味するからです。もう感情がないからです。 動かないチェンジセットに5ドルも無駄にしたのは悪いことだ。

Claude Max(月100ドル)をお持ちの場合は、Claude Codeも使えます サブスクリプションベースの価格設定で。CodeMCPの価値提案は以下の通りです。

NOTICE: claude code is available with Anthropic’s $20/mo subscription, so I consider codemcp fully obsolete. However, there are some good design ideas (especially around the Git-versioning scheme) that I eventually want to port into the current generation of agentic coding clis.

codemcp

Make Claude Desktop a pair programming assistant by installing codemcp. With it, you can directly ask Claude to implement features, fix bugs and do refactors on a codebase on your computer; Claude will directly edit files and run tests. Say goodbye to copying code in and out of Claude’s chat window!

codemcp offers similar functionality to other AI coding software (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Aider), but it occupies a unique point in the design space:

1. It’s intended to be used with Claude Pro, Anthropic’s $20/mo subscription offering. I like paying for my usage with a subscription plan because it means zero marginal cost for agent actions; no more feeling bad that you wasted five bucks on a changeset that doesn’t work.

   Note that if you have Claude Max ($100/mo), Claude Code can also be used with subscription based pricing. The value proposition for codemcp is murkier in this case (and it is definitely inferior to Claude Code in some respects), but you can still use codemcp with Claude Max if you prefer some of the other UI decisions it makes. (Also, it’s open source, so you can change it if you don’t like it, unlike Claude Code!)

2. It’s built around auto-accept by default. I want my agent to get as far as it can without my supervision, so I can review everything in one go at the end. There are two key things that codemcp does differently than most coding agents: we forbid unrestricted shell, instead requiring you to predeclare commands the agent can use in codemcp.toml, and we Git version all LLM edits, so you can roll back agent changes on a fine-grained basis and don’t have to worry about forgetting to commit changes.

3. It’s IDE agnostic: you ask Claude to make changes, it makes them, and then you can use your favorite IDE setup to review the changes and make further edits. I use vim as my daily driver editor, and coding environments that require VSCode or a specific editor are a turn off for me.

IMPORTANT: For master users - Major changes for token efficiency

To improve codemcp’s token efficiency, on master I am in the process of changing codemcp back into a multi-tool tool (instead of a single tool whose instructions are blatted into chat when you InitProject). This means you have to manually approve tool use. Because tool use approval is persistent across multiple chats, I think this is a reasonable tradeoff to make, but if you really don’t like, file a bug at refined-claude browser