MA

mrshu/agent-skills

Developer tools
20 stars Quality 47 Trend 31

Useful skills for AI agents (Claude Code, etc.)

Overview

A Claude Code plugin marketplace with useful skills for AI agents. For hosts that consume skills directly via npx skills, install the Review Anvil family with its reviewer backends in one command: Find academic papers, explore citations, and export BibTeX. Uses four tools under the hood: - (Semantic Scholar) — paper recommendations, citation/reference networks, arXiv/DOI lookups - (OpenAlex) — broadest coverage (260M+ works), institution/journal queries, aggregation - (arXiv) — direct arXiv search, paper lookup by ID, browse recent submissions by category - (DBLP) — high-quality, curated BibTeX export All tools run via uvx — no installation needed. Convert academic PDFs to clean Markdown. Supports local files and remote URLs (e.g. arXiv).

README

agent-skills

A Claude Code plugin marketplace with useful skills for AI agents.

Installation

First, add the marketplace:

/plugin marketplace add mrshu/agent-skills

Then install plugins:

/plugin install scholar-search
/plugin install wshot
/plugin install paper-siphon
/plugin install codex-exec
/plugin install claude-exec
/plugin install review-anvil
/plugin install overleaf-comment
/plugin install overleaf-compile
/plugin install gdocs-comment
/plugin install gh-pr-image

For hosts that consume skills directly via npx skills, install the Review Anvil family with its reviewer backends in one command:

npx skills add mrshu/agent-skills \
  --skill review-anvil \
  --skill review-anvil-readonly \
  --skill review-anvil-pr \
  --skill review-anvil-improve-pr \
  --skill codex-exec \
  --skill claude-exec

Plugins

Find academic papers, explore citations, and export BibTeX. Uses four tools under the hood:

  • s2cli (Semantic Scholar) — paper recommendations, citation/reference networks, arXiv/DOI lookups
  • openalexcli (OpenAlex) — broadest coverage (260M+ works), institution/journal queries, aggregation
  • arxivy (arXiv) — direct arXiv search, paper lookup by ID, browse recent submissions by category
  • dblpcli (DBLP) — high-quality, curated BibTeX export

All tools run via uvx — no installation needed.

paper-siphon

Convert academic PDFs to clean Markdown. Supports local files and remote URLs (e.g. arXiv). Three extraction modes:

  • Default — fast Docling-based extraction, handles most papers
  • VLM (--vlm) — vision-language model for complex layouts and scans
  • Formula enrichment (--enrich-formula) — better LaTeX fidelity for math-heavy papers

Runs via uvx — no installation needed.

codex-exec

Delegate code review, plan review, and deep exploration tasks to Codex CLI from Claude Code. Use it as a pre-push quality gate, plan counter-review, or deep-dig exploration tool. Key commands:

  • codex review --base main — review current branch against main
  • codex review --uncommitted — review work-in-progress changes
  • codex exec '' — custom prompted review, plan critique, or codebase exploration

claude-exec

Delegate code review, plan review, and deep exploration tasks to Claude Code CLI from Codex or other agents. The mirror of codex-exec — lets non-Claude agents get an independent second opinion. Key commands:

  • claude -p '' — non-interactive review or exploration
  • claude -p --permission-mode dontAsk --tools "Bash,Read,Glob,Grep" ... — scripted review with an explicit built-in tool set
  • See plugins/claude-exec/skills/claude-exec/SKILL.md for the full fallback recipe, including --allowedTools, stdin prompts, and watchdog use.

review-anvil

review-anvil turns a code review into a repeatable loop: codex-exec and claude-exec reviewers inspect the same snapshot, their findings are merged into one report, uncertain claims are checked against the code, and the loop either reports, commits fixes, or updates a PR.

It is built for the messy middle after a first implementation, when you want several independent review passes, fewer bogus findings, and fixes that are checked before they land.

I want to… Use Edits code Commits Pushes Posts to PR Can approve
Harden local changes with fix commits review-anvil Yes Yes No No No
Review without touching files review-anvil-readonly No No No No No
Review a PR and post findings review-anvil-pr No No No Yes Yes, unless disabled
Improve a checked-out PR branch review-anvil-improve-pr Yes Yes Yes Yes No

What makes it useful:

  • Parallel review: Codex and Claude reviewers inspect the same snapshot with different lenses, then the workflow merges overlapping findings.
  • Claim checking: single-reviewer material findings, risky deletions, and uncertain claims are checked before they become comments or fix commits. Establish required behavior and the applicable PR change before choosing proof expectations; observing a mechanism alone does not prove a defect.
  • Retained executable proof: with proof_runner: /trusted/absolute/path, behavior claims get focused probes against an exact disposable snapshot. The runner must disable network access, mount source and proof inputs read-only, restrict reads to source/proof/runtime inputs, allow writes only under the proof runtime directory, author execution results after the probe exits, bound resources, and sanitize the environment. Proof bundles remain in a host-created private directory outside the reviewed worktree and Git common directory; without a runner, generated probes stay unexecuted and the finding remains deferred.
  • Verified fixes: fixing runs use the project’s test/build command when available and should not leave the branch newly red.
  • Adaptive rounds: fixing runs can stop early when the review converges, or continue up to 6 total rounds when useful fixes are still surfacing. Use “exactly 3 rounds” or max_rounds: 3 when you want a hard stop.
  • PR-native output: anchored findings become full inline review comments; broader findings stay in one focused summary. Select the necessary connection between condition and consequence, or the reason existing evidence falls short, before freezing facts for the clarity pass and its source fallback. Keep proof details separate from diagnosis and preserve requested work.
  • Impact-based priority: judge supported workflows, APIs, workers, and tools by their concrete consequences. Bounded, recoverable incorrect behavior is not automatically high severity; security and data-integrity risks remain serious even without a prior incident or a UI trigger.
  • Conversation-aware follow-ups: PR runs read replies from the PR author, validate explanations against the current code, suppress accepted findings, and resolve only obsolete review-anvil threads. Human-authored review threads are never auto-resolved.
  • PR repair flow: review-anvil-improve-pr can announce a run, commit and push verified fixes to a checked-out PR branch, then update the same PR comment with the result.
  • Approval control: review-anvil-pr can submit a real GitHub approval when review-only checks pass. Use approve: never or “comment only” when approval should stay human.
  • Simplicity lens: the default focus includes a minimization ladder (need it at all? → stdlib → native feature → existing dependency → one line → the minimum that works), adapted from ponytail.

The plugin ships four cross-agent skills under plugins/review-anvil/skills/. Anything that supports Skill (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, Continue, Cline, Gemini CLI, …) can activate them by description match. In Claude Code, you can also invoke directly as Skill review-anvil "<free-form args>"; see skills/review-anvil/SKILL.md for the full behavior and advanced controls (rounds, max_rounds, agents, focus, target, verify_cmd, reproduction, proof_runner, adversarial, approve, report_path, and more).

overleaf-comment

Bulk-post Overleaf comments from a JSON plan. Drives the user’s already-logged-in browser tab via Chrome DevTools Protocol, so no API keys / no test accounts. Break-even is around 5 comments — under that, type them by hand.

  • overleaf-comment --list — show open Overleaf project tabs
  • overleaf-comment plan.json — post the plan against a tab prefix from --list
  • overleaf-comment --url https://www.overleaf.com/project/ plan.json — auto-resolve the tab from the project URL

Plan items are {file, line, text}. Failed/skipped items are written to .residual.json so a retry is one command.

Requirements:

  • A chrome-cdp skill installation (auto-discovered or via $CDP_BIN)
  • Brave / Chrome / Chromium running with --remote-debugging-port=9222
  • The Overleaf project tab open and logged in, with commenting permission

overleaf-compile

Recompile an Overleaf project and extract its build logs/errors/warnings in a standardized format — closing a push → compile → debug loop. API-first: calls Overleaf’s internal compile endpoint from inside the logged-in tab and fetches the raw output.log / output.blg, so the diagnostics are complete (not the truncated logs pane).

  • overleaf-compile --list — show open Overleaf project tabs
  • overleaf-compile — recompile and emit standardized JSON logs
  • overleaf-compile --url https://www.overleaf.com/project/ — auto-resolve the tab
  • overleaf-compile --errors-only --format compiler — fast human-readable triage

Entries are {level, file, line, message, source, count} with level ∈ error|warning|typesetting|info|bib-*. Note that Overleaf’s status: "success" only means a PDF was produced — the exit code (and parsed errors count) is the real verdict. --clear-cache recompiles from scratch; --out-dir saves the raw artifacts; --no-recompile reads the on-screen logs pane without compiling.

Requirements:

  • A chrome-cdp skill installation (auto-discovered or via $CDP_BIN)
  • Brave / Chrome / Chromium running with --remote-debugging-port=9222
  • The Overleaf project tab open and logged in
  • python3 on PATH (log parsing)

gdocs-comment

Bulk-post anchored Google Docs comments (with @-mentions) from a JSON plan. Drives the user’s already-logged-in browser tab via Chrome DevTools Protocol — no Drive API keys, no OAuth dance. Break-even is around 5 comments — under that, type them by hand.

  • gdocs-comment --list — show open Google Docs tabs
  • gdocs-comment plan.json — post the plan against a tab prefix from --list
  • gdocs-comment --url https://docs.google.com/document/d//edit plan.json — auto-resolve the tab from the document URL
  • gdocs-comment --dry-run plan.json — validate the plan without posting

Plan items are {anchor, text, mentions?} — anchor is a substring of the doc body, and the comment is anchored to the first match. Failed items are written to .residual.json for one-command retry.

Requirements:

  • A chrome-cdp skill installation (auto-discovered or via $CDP_BIN)
  • Chrome / Brave / Edge with remote debugging enabled
  • The Google Doc tab open and logged in, with comment permission
  • Node.js 22+

gh-pr-image

Upload local images (screenshots, visual diffs, diagrams) to a GitHub PR description or comment without committing them to the repo. GitHub has no public API for PR-description image uploads, so this uses release assets as a CDN — the only fully scriptable, CLI-only approach that also works for private repos.

  • Creates a per-PR prerelease tag with the images attached as assets
  • Embeds the browser_download_url for each asset in the PR body via standard markdown
  • Asset URLs respect repo read access, so they render correctly in private-repo PRs

Requirements:

  • gh (GitHub CLI), authenticated
  • Push access to the target repo (release creation)

wshot

Screenshot tool for Wayland/GNOME. Capture windows by app name, PID, title, or window ID.

Requirements:

  • GNOME with Wayland
  • window-calls extension (auto-prompted if missing)

License

MIT

View the full README on GitHub

Recommended Tools

Try a different keyword or remove a filter.

Install

npx skillfish add mrshu/agent-skills
New to MCP? Start with the mcpskill.org guide →