The NSFC has a pulse.

A structured medical examination of the country ’ s natural application: finding logical breakpoints and handing over modifications.

[[T0] is the diagnosis of Agent Skill for use in the first draft of the application of the National Fund for Natural Sciences (NSFC/National Nature). It is open to applicants who already have drafts, and helps to generate proposals for changes from the perspective of topics, summaries, basis for project formulation, key scientific issues, research content, innovation points, research base, graphics, literature and form fields.

It is not a proxy and does not promise to apply successfully, nor is it a substitute for the applicant ’ s own scientific judgement, peer expert advice, trust unit requirements and official guidance from the Fund Board.

The rule baseline has been verified to 2026-09-12: the application requirements are differentiated by year of application, specific project category, form version and lump sum/budget basis. At the end of the year 2026, the youth C category uses three body parts, with research content allowing for autonomous organization; scientific issues, objectives and methods are examined by content and no old, independent titles are imposed. Subsequent annual rules need to be verified separately. Source and historical calibration calibrated to maintain desk accounts.

Communication group

Problems, cases, suggestions for improvement, and welcome to exchange ideas.

QQ group: nsfc-skill communication, group number 1062928117

Quick start

Application PDF, DOCX, Markdown, plain text, or core clip to Agent. When a sample is provided, the neutron is used for anonymization, indicating the type of project, the year in which it was funded, the rough discipline/application code and the research attributes.

Apply scene

• There is a first draft of the project applications for youth, surface and area, which requires a structural medical examination.
• To examine whether topics, summaries, key scientific issues and innovation points are mutually supportive.
• To examine whether scientific issues are well-established: whether the source of the problem is credible, whether the evidence of bottlenecks is sufficient, whether the difficulties and the innovation points are mutually reinforcing and whether the research attributes are consistent with the actual contribution. Four historical scientific issue attributes are used only in applicable versions or case studies.
• Attempts to expose early problems that the evaluator may be stuck while reading fast.
• Trying to produce an enforceable “priority change list” rather than a general refinement.
• To examine the annual plan and expected results: whether the substantive milestones and the mandate depend on clarity; whether the scientific results are specific, verifiable and linked to scientific issues.
• To check whether the budget or resources are right and whether the research mandate is right: to identify common subjects, existing equipment, platform levels and additional expenditures, and to identify real resource gaps. Packaged applications are not reported as not having a budget table.
• To review the previous Views on an article-by-article basis, drawing a distinction between resolved, partially implemented, still in existence, invalid changes, withdrawal or non-applicability of the original opinion, lack of material beyond judgement, preservation of the old report for retroactive purposes.
• There are pre-existing/funded books on hand to refine the migrationable writing patterns after anonymity and to use them against the current draft.
• To use the Board ’ s Big Data Knowledge Management Service portal (kd.nsfc.cn) to verify the risk of a pick-up problem, whether the application code is sent to the Ministry of Education, whether the expected results exceed commitments, and the extent to which the projects that it has closed duplicated the book.
• Medical, clinical or biomedical books require additional examination of disease mechanisms, samples/teams, modelling systems, ethics, biosafety and transformation certification chains。