CL

cabbage2000-lab/textbook-writer-skills

Developer tools

This page was translated automatically. Technical details may differ from the original. View the original

44 stars Quality 62 Trend 42MIT

UbD reverse-design-driven teaching materials writing skill combination, with one key loaded into Claude Code / Codex / WorkBuddy: Five sets of teaching locator → → 树 树 树 树 树 树 树 树 树 树 树. The subject is not kernel-related + can be inserted into the subject's file, the science reality review, the humanities and social science cross-checks the source word by word, and does not verify that the label is "required by the author" ; key decision-makers board is cut off for any renewal

Overview

Textbook-Writer-Skills is a textbook writing group with Claude Code/ Codex/ Domestic WorkBuddy. It incorporates mature teaching and design methods into AI's workstreams: first, think of what to take, and then reverse chapters and exercises, a chapter with a master line, gradients, and a system-based textbook with a reliable answer to the subject — a cut-off. Currently: 5 skills (1 main dispatch + 3 water lines skill + 1 independent support) cover the five-stage full process from catalogue planning to final review, and can be written by science, humanities and economics. The differences in disciplines are not scattered in the process, but rather converged into a pivotable** - there are only four things that change with the discipline: question set, means of validation, cognitive verbs, internal chapter. There are three internal subjects: stem, which addresses the recalculated subjects of mathematics, physics, computers, etc. (the return of the whole case has been made); humanities, which addresses history, philosophy, literature, politics, sociology, art history, etc., depends on the field of argument, replacing the word "real" with "check source" (the outline and single-chapter paths have been validated by eval 7, 8); economics, which addresses the ** disciplines of economics and finance — modeling recalculation, statistical data only to verify the source, policy questions not to be applied, but to point the point of argument, with three types of tools (eval 9, 10 to run) interwoven in the same textbook. The three archives share the same set of verification disciplines, in exchange for a nuclear approach. Supporting a new category does not require a kernel, but simply a file and a line in the index. The precise definition of the stage contract, fallout layout and status machine is based on handoff-contract.md, and the entry point for the discipline difference is subject-profile-spec.md. The difficulty in writing educational materials is not in writing itself, but in teaching design. The tools have been put in place to solve the problem of "organizing the material into a growth document", and the solution of the skill is "how to teach a knowledge." - Pedagogical orientation, UbD five kits, chapter trees are the soul of a teaching material. Skill gives a draft that stops at two check points, such as Gate, and confirms that no "process optimization" should be bypassed. It's your job to make you think, not your choice. - The unverified conclusion would rather be marked as "required by the author" than output a fabricated result that seems confident. - Four skills on the current line, one of the pipes, one of the stages, a written contract, and no reading of each other's middle process... This is an engineering guarantee that each chapter is of a stable quality and completes a long course。

Overview (machine translated)

English

Textbook-Writer-Skills is a textbook writing group with Claude Code/ Codex/ Domestic WorkBuddy. It incorporates mature teaching and design methods into AI’s workstreams: first, think of what to take, and then reverse chapters and exercises, a chapter with a master line, gradients, and a system-based textbook with a reliable answer to the subject — a cut-off. Currently v0.7.0.: 5 skills (1 main dispatch + 3 water lines skill + 1 independent support) cover the five-stage full-process process from work catalogue planning to final review, which can be written by science, humanities and economics.

** A set of kernels, multidisciplinary categories. ** Discrepancies of disciplines are not scattered in the process, but rather concretize into a removable scientiary archive — only four things change with the discipline: a thematic set, means of validation, cognitive verbs, internal chapter. Three internal subjects: [[T0] Recalculable subjects for mathematics, physics, computers, etc. (repeated); [T1] Answers for history, philosophy, literature, political science, sociology, artistic history, etc., depend on the field of argument, replacing the word “real review” with the word “venal source” (the outline and the two tracks of a single chapter have been validated by eval 7, 8); [ [T2] Studies for economics and finance ** mixed** disciplines — model recalculation, statistical data can only be identified, policy questions are not applicable and three types of tools are interwoven in the same textbook (eval 9, 10 to run). The three archives share the same set of verification disciplines, in exchange for a nuclear approach. Supporting a new category does not require a kernel, but simply a file and a line in the index.

The precise definition of the stage contract, fallout layout and status machine is based on handoff-contract.md, and the entry point for the discipline difference is subject-profile-spec.md.

Design philosophy

** Pedagogical design, not long-form. ** The difficulty in writing educational materials is not in writing itself, but in teaching design. The tools have been put in place to solve the problem of “organizing the material into a growth document”, and the solution of the skill is “how to teach a knowledge.”

  • ** Key decision-making by author board. ** Teaching orientation, UbD five kits, chapter trees are the soul of a teaching material. Skill gives a draft that stops at two check points, such as Gate, and confirms that no “process optimization” should be bypassed. It’s your job to make you think, not your choice.
  • ** honesty takes precedence over fluidity. ** The unverified conclusion would prefer to be “required by the author” rather than output a fabricated result that appears confident.
  • ** With a water line instead of a breath. ** 4 skills on the current line, each one of which is transferred by written contract, without reading each other’s intermediate process — This is an engineering guarantee that each chapter is of a stable quality and completes a long course.

** Non-compromising bottom line**: the answer to each question must be verified by means defined in the disciplinary files (scientific reality review, literature verification of sources and quotations), and all non-verifiable references [(T3]; two-gate of phase 2/3 must be clearly confirmed by the author before release。

This page was translated automatically. Technical details may differ from the original.

Recommended Tools

Try a different keyword or remove a filter.

Install

npx skillfish add cabbage2000-lab/textbook-writer-skills
New to MCP? Start with the mcpskill.org guide →