来自一组AI模型的第二意见：每个模型都基于不同的数据、各自的框架训练，因此各自带来了自己的建议，还有一个未被问到的部分，涵盖你没问的内容。
概览
一个面板有两个好处：1. 每个模型都用自己的数据训练，运行在自己的框架中：供应商的CLI代理或API，自己的网页搜索，自己的页面阅读方式。所以当你问“我该如何设计这个”或“审查这段代码”时，每个模型都会给出自己的建议，而且他们合起来覆盖的内容比任何一个都多。2. 模型之间从未见过彼此的答案。当他们意见一致时，那意味着什么;当他们意见不合时，意味着更多。一个AI同意你并不能证明什么。 每个综述答案都以一个章节结束。模型在此放置错误假设、风险、更好的替代方案或值得检查的部分——只列出它会辩护为重要性的部分，如果没有，则说明。最有价值的发现往往来自这里。 发送同一份文档：GPT、Gemini、Grok、Kimi、Qwen、DeepSeek、GLM、MiMo、Muse Spark、NVIDIA Nemotron 和 Claude（如果你开启的话）。
概述（AI 翻译）
每个AI模型知道的事情都不同。同时问好几个，你不仅会得到一个检查，还会得到任何单一模型都不会给你的建议——包括你没问过的内容。
一份文档同时送到多个AI模型，一份报告会被反馈。 把文档发送给你打开的渠道后面的AI厂商才是关键;工具本身没有服务器，不收集任何数据，它自己最多每周检查一次GitHub的新版本（文件放哪里）。
真是一场精彩的跑步
2026年10月17日，作者的机器和账户上运行了1.113.0版本：七个CLI代理，而非发布的默认面板（下面有那个）。他们被问及该工具应在哪里，什么会阻挡列表，附带我们自己的通道表及其规则。根据该版本的 REPORT.md，仍留在作者的机器上：
| 模型（运行方式） | 时间 | 引用链接 | 活跃 | 死亡 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 太阳（法典CLI） | 16分钟 | 50 | 40 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.8 Max（Qwen代码CLI）† | 26分钟 | 14 | 7 | 0 |
| Grok 4.7（Grok 构建 CLI） | 7分钟 | 21 | 17 | 0 |
| 双子座3.8闪光（反重力CLI） | 5分钟 | 29 | 21 | 0 |
| 灵感火花1。 |
本页由 AI 翻译，技术细节请以原文为准。
README
以下为原文 README 节选，完整内容请查看原文。
AI Second Opinion
Every AI model knows different things. Ask several at once and you get not only a check, but advice no single model would have given you — including on what you did not ask.
One document goes to several AI models at once, and one report comes back. Sending your document to the AI vendors behind the channels you turn on is the whole point; the tool itself has no server and collects nothing, and on its own it only checks GitHub for a new version, at most once a day (what goes where).
What a real run found
A run of version 1.113.0 on 2026-10-17, on the author’s machine and accounts: seven CLI agents, not the published default panel (that one is below). They were asked where this tool should be listed and what would block a listing, with our own table of channels and their rules attached. From that run’s REPORT.md, which stays on the author’s machine:
| Model (how it ran) | Time | Links cited | Live | Dead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol (Codex CLI) | 16 min | 50 | 40 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.8 Max (Qwen Code CLI) † | 26 min | 14 | 7 | 0 |
| Grok 4.7 (Grok Build CLI) | 7 min | 21 | 17 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash (Antigravity CLI) | 5 min | 29 | 21 | 0 |
| Muse Spark 1.3 (opencode, Go plan) † | 1 min | 22 | 16 | 2 |
| MiMo v2.6 Pro (mimo CLI) † | 8 min | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| MiMo v2.6 Flash (opencode) | 12 min | 0 | — | — |
† A route the published version leaves off. Live: the link opened when the tool checked it; dead: it returned 404; the rest had moved, blocked the check or could not be checked. A live link does not show that the model read it.
- A rule our own table had missed. It said we meet the entry rules of the awesome-claude-code list. Five of the seven (GPT-6.1 Sol, Qwen, Grok, Gemini, MiMo Pro) pointed to a rule further down its CONTRIBUTING.md: «if your project requires any form of signup or payment, this is a blocker for reviewing it - I can only recommend such a resource on the basis of community adoption signals».
- A disagreement, kept in view. Build an MCP server now? MiMo Flash, the one voice that cited no links: «Build it — as a thin wrapper, started now…». The other six: not now.
- What was cited is not what was read. Gemini cited 29 links; the tool saw it open 2 of them. Muse Spark’s two dead links are one real GitHub Docs page, cited twice with part of the path replaced by «…».
推荐工具
换一个关键词，或者移除筛选条件。
安装
npx skillfish add igorsaevets/ai-second-opinion