Each persona has a documented , , , and — they aren't just labels. They genuinely disagree.
개요
Each persona has a documented , , , and — they aren't just labels. They genuinely disagree.
README
The Problem with AI Advice
Every AI gives you the same thing:
✅ On one hand...
✅ On the other hand...
✅ It really depends on your situation...
✅ Here are some things to consider...
Nobody takes a position. Nobody disagrees. Nobody tells you the uncomfortable truth.
Claude Council fixes this.
How it works
You describe a decision, idea, or problem
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ THE COUNCIL │
│ │
│ ⚔ Adversary ──── finds the fatal flaw │
│ 📈 Strategist ─── market, ROI, timing │
│ 🔬 Scientist ──── base rates, evidence │
│ 🎨 Visionary ──── reframes the problem │
│ ⚙ Engineer ───── what breaks at scale │
│ 🧘 Philosopher ── first principles, 10-yr view │
│ ❤ Humanist ───── the people, the psychology │
│ │
│ They debate each other. They disagree. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ THE VERDICT │
│ │
│ POSITION: Clear stance. No hedging. │
│ CONFIDENCE: 74% (and why) │
│ RISKS: 3 things that could kill this │
│ NEXT STEPS: 5 actions for tomorrow │
│ DISSENT: The strongest counterargument │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The 7 Personas
┌──────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ⚔ ADVERSARY │ Finds what everyone else is afraid to say. │
│ │ "That's not a plan. That's a hope." │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 📈 STRATEGIST │ Market size, moats, timing, competitive dynamics. │
│ │ Thinks in years, not weeks. │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🔬 SCIENTIST │ Base rates, evidence, what the data says. │
│ │ "The reference class for this decision shows..." │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🎨 VISIONARY │ Questions the question. Finds the back door. │
│ │ "You're playing the wrong game entirely." │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ⚙ ENGINEER │ Feasibility, systems, edge cases, failure modes. │
│ │ "This breaks at 10x. Here's exactly how." │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🧘 PHILOSOPHER │ First principles, values, 10-year consequences. │
│ │ "What are you actually optimizing for?" │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ❤ HUMANIST │ The people. The psychology. The real cost. │
│ │ "Who else lives with this decision?" │
└──────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Each persona has a documented voice, bias, blind spot, and debate behavior — they aren’t just labels. They genuinely disagree.
See it in action
Installation
2 minutes. No account needed beyond Claude.
Step 1 — Clone the repo
git clone https://github.com/itshussainsprojects/Claude-Council-Skill.git
Step 2 — Open Claude.ai → Settings → Skills → Add Skill
Step 3 — Upload the council/ folder
Step 4 — Start talking. The Council triggers automatically.
Trigger phrases: “Should I…”, “Is this a good idea…”, “Help me decide…”, “Stress-test this:”, “Convene the Council”
What makes it different from just prompting ChatGPT?
┌───────────────────────┬──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┐
│ │ Short ChatGPT Prompt │ Claude Council │
├───────────────────────┼──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┤
│ Consistent structure │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ Documented biases │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ Real inter-persona │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ debate │ │ │
│ Calibrated confidence │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ Minority report │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ Permanent (no │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ re-pasting) │ │ │
│ Open source / │ ✗ │ ✓ │
│ customizable │ │ │
└───────────────────────┴──────────────────────┴──────────────────────┘
You could write a 2000-word prompt to replicate this. This is that prompt — already written, tested, and free.
Works best for
💼 Business decisions 🏗️ Technical architecture
💰 Job offers & salary 🎨 Creative project strategy
🚀 Startup ideas 📚 Educational choices
🔀 Career pivots ❓ Any "should I" with real stakes
Repo structure
claude-council-skill/
│
├── council/ ← Install this folder into Claude
│ ├── SKILL.md ← Core skill logic & trigger rules
│ ├── personas/
│ │ ├── adversary.md ← Voice, bias, blind spot, debate style
│ │ ├── strategist.md
│ │ ├── scientist.md
│ │ ├── visionary.md
│ │ ├── engineer.md
│ │ ├── philosopher.md
│ │ └── humanist.md
│ └── templates/
│ ├── debate-format.md ← Exact banner & structure rules
│ └── verdict-format.md ← Verdict block specification
│
├── examples/ ← 3 full real-world outputs
│ ├── startup-decision.md
│ ├── career-change.md
│ └── technical-architecture.md
│
├── README.md
├── INSTALL.md ← 3 installation methods + troubleshooting
├── CONTRIBUTING.md ← How to add new personas
└── LICENSE ← MIT
Contributing
The most wanted contributions:
- New personas — Lawyer, Therapist, Historian, UX Researcher, Financial Planner
- New examples — relationship decisions, health choices, investment moves
- Better triggers — edge cases where the Council should or shouldn’t fire
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the persona template and quality bar.
Community
“The Adversary said something I had been avoiding thinking about for 6 months.”
“74% confidence with a specific reason. First time AI gave me something I could actually act on.”
“The Visionary reframe completely changed how I was thinking about my startup.”
🌐 Live Demo Site
Try the interactive demo: itshussainsprojects.github.io/Claude-Council-Skill
See 4 famous decisions debated live — with tabs, persona cards, and full verdicts.
📜 Famous Decisions — The Council Weighs In
What would the Council have said about the biggest decisions in business history?
| Decision | Verdict | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Steve Jobs return to Apple (1997) | Take it — founding frame, not turnaround | 79% |
| 🐦 Elon Musk buy Twitter for $44B | Don’t — debt structure makes it near-impossible | 61% |
| 📘 Zuckerberg drop out of Harvard | Drop out — winner-take-all, speed is everything | 82% |
| 📺 Netflix pivot to streaming (2007) | Build streaming, keep DVDs as runway | 76% |
The Adversary on Jobs returning to Apple: “You’re not being brought back because they believe in you. You’re being brought back because everyone else failed.”
The Visionary on Zuckerberg: “You’re asking whether to finish your homework before discovering fire.”
The Philosopher on Musk/Twitter: “One person owning the infrastructure of global public discourse has no historical precedent in a private transaction.”
What famous decision should the Council analyze next? Open an issue →
Developed by Hussain Ali
추천 도구
다른 키워드를 입력하거나 필터를 제거해 보세요.
설치
npx skillfish add itshussainsprojects/claude-council-skill