연구 논문 (현지 PDF 또는 arXiv)을 읽는 대리인 시스템은 구현 계획을 생성하고, 코드를 작성하고, 리뷰를 작성합니다. Claude Agent SDK에 내장 된 중앙 이사 에이전트에 의해 모든 오케스트라.

감정

# # # 연구 swarm을 사용하여 C에서 Rewrote 변압기

작업 비디오

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing] [T0]] [T0]] [T0]] [T0]] [T0]] [T0]] [T0]] [T0] [T0] [T0]] [T0] [T0] [T0]] [T0]] [T0] [T0] [T0] [T0] [T0]] [T0] [T0]] [T0] [T0] [T0]] [T0]] [T0] [T0] [T0]] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing]]] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing]]]]]] [[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing]]]]]]] [[[[[[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing]]]]]]]]]]]]]] [[[[[[[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[

건축

파이프 라인

그것이 작동하는 방법

** (예, “변환 텍스트 클래스터 구축”) 및 ** 연구 용지 ** 시스템을 제공합니다. 이사는 5 단계 파이프라인을 실행합니다.

사용자 승인은 각 단계 사이에 필요합니다.

2개의 입력 형태

Research Swarm - Paper-to-Production AI Pipeline

An agentic system that reads research papers (local PDFs or arXiv), generates implementation plans, writes code, and reviews it — all orchestrated by a central Director agent built on the Claude Agent SDK.

Artifacts

Rewrote transformer in C using research swarm

Working video

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_X-twfbmvwykQ3i8JyU2HN_gqcr0T0-S/view?usp=sharing

Architecture

graph TB
    User([User: Objective + Papers]) --> Director

    subgraph Orchestration
        Director[Director AgentOpus - Orchestrator]
    end

    subgraph "Stage 1: Read"
        Director -->|local files| PaperReader[Paper ReaderSonnet]
        Director -->|arXiv IDs| ArxivReader[ArXiv ReaderSonnet + MCP]
    end

    subgraph "Stage 2: Plan"
        Director --> Planner[PlannerOpus]
    end

    subgraph "Stage 3: Code"
        Director --> Coder[CoderOpus + Sandbox]
    end

    subgraph "Stage 4: Review"
        Director --> Reviewer[ReviewerSonnet]
    end

    PaperReader -->|summaries| Approval1{User Approval}
    ArxivReader -->|summaries| Approval1
    Approval1 --> Planner
    Planner -->|plan| Approval2{User Approval}
    Approval2 --> Coder
    Coder -->|code| Approval3{User Approval}
    Approval3 --> Reviewer
    Reviewer -->|review| Approval4{User Approval}
    Approval4 --> Deliver([Final Delivery])

    style Director fill:#6366f1,color:#fff
    style PaperReader fill:#06b6d4,color:#fff
    style ArxivReader fill:#06b6d4,color:#fff
    style Planner fill:#8b5cf6,color:#fff
    style Coder fill:#8b5cf6,color:#fff
    style Reviewer fill:#06b6d4,color:#fff
    style Approval1 fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
    style Approval2 fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
    style Approval3 fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
    style Approval4 fill:#f59e0b,color:#000

Pipeline

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant D as Director
    participant R as Paper Reader
    participant P as Planner
    participant C as Coder
    participant V as Reviewer

    U->>D: Objective + Papers (PDF/MD or arXiv IDs)
    D->>R: Read & summarize papers
    R-->>D: output/summaries/
    D->>U: Here's what I found. Proceed?
    U->>D: Yes, focus on technique X

    D->>P: Create implementation plan
    P-->>D: output/plans/plan.md
    D->>U: Here's the plan. Approve?
    U->>D: Approved

    D->>C: Implement the plan
    C->>C: Write code + sandbox test each module
    C-->>D: output/code/
    D->>U: Code ready. Review?
    U->>D: Yes

    D->>V: Review code vs paper
    V-->>D: output/reviews/review.md
    D->>U: Review: PASS (score 8/10)

How It Works